" I think you should reject this manuscript.....this article would not be useful to either experts or novices...
The article might be salvaged by a major rewrite, but very little from the current version is worth keeping. "
Of course, there was more. Attached was a 3-page detailed point-by-point breakdown about what was wrong. I discovered who this chap was, let's just say that I had my methods. To be fair, he did have some valid points. So I spend the next few weeks writing, rewriting, addressing all his concerns and such until it becomes this gleaming thing of pure beauty, of which am very proud. I send it off again, and nervously wait. I daydream about how this chap is going to read it again, and acknowledge that yes indeed, this manuscript is seminal, wonderfully written and that Mr. Bird has addressed all of his concerns to the dot above i.
Today I discover that the manuscript got in.
Why the anti-climax? The editor of the journal was also one of my co-authors. He didn't send it out to the reviewers again. He just deemed my corrections were suffice. Mr. Fan never got to see the great comeback.
